Rep. Eric Burlison Discusses Alleged Large UAP Object Located Overseas [0:00-5:00]
This is reportedly an object that is not in this country, that is so large, it cannot be moved, that they've built an entire building around it. And that's one of the locations that I'm requesting to get to. It's going to be very, it's going to involve a lot to get to make that happen, but that may be the final destination. So that is the claim and it was made by a Republican member of Congress that there is reportedly this object in another country that's so big it can't be moved and a massive structure has been built around it to hide its location, but several questions remain. What is this? When did it get here and why is it being kept a secret? Our next guests are both trying to get those answers. Missouri Congressman Eric Burleson who sits on the Congressional Oversight Committee investigating UAPs and is trying to get permission to visit this alleged site is with us alongside the founder of the Disclosure Project, Dr. Stephen Greer. It's great to have you both here, Congressman, what do we know about what this thing really is? I don't know that I have any hard evidence of what it really is, I've had allegations from both inside and outside of the federal government that there is this object that exists in another country. I'm not going to mention the country because I've heard of it inside of a closed setting and so, and I want to protect my classification, though, but others may say that I can tell you that it's not in the facility that's been widely reported in the news, but I have been receiving reports both inside and outside of people that have worked in the federal government that there is the potential that this exists. Okay, Dr. Greer, you have said publicly that this is outside Seoul, South Korea. Is that accurate? One of them. Now, remember, I have to brief, almost 800 whistleblowers who have had direct involvement with this. One of them was with the Pentagon for about eight years of the very senior investigator and had baseline clearance across 18 black project and acknowledged special access projects. He specifically knew of the one in the mountains outside Seoul, South Korea. It was so huge. They had to build a structure around it and he was right into this in between 2002 and 2010. Okay. So it had been there for some time. Now, I also know there are others that have been brought down in other locations. And if they're over a certain size, they're very, very hard to move. Imagine if they're bigger than a football field and you're not going to put that on a semi. So it becomes logistically impossible to move it. And then in the United States, we know where there are some others such as near Fort Sillo, Oklahoma. There's a smaller one. They had they built a skip of facility around that one. We have its location. So I know that the congressman can speak, you know, to what he's limited, but because I'm a private citizen, I can discuss these congressman, are you referring to the location in South Korea? I can't be specific to that location, but there are wide reports. What I can say is that I've seen articles that have pointed to a specific building and from what I've been told that is not the facility. Can you explain why we can't? You're trying to get permission. I assume from our government and another government or somebody with another country to go visit whatever this thing is. Maybe it's a spaceship. Maybe it's nothing. Why can't we talk about where it is? I don't get that. Again, because of the information was gathered inside a classified setting on my behalf. What I can tell you is I have been trying to get access to even locations that reportedly have craft that are being reverse engineered, that are even close to Washington, DC. And I'm having a difficult time getting access to even those facilities that are just within a few miles from my office in Washington, DC. So to try to attempt to go to another country and get permission at that level is going to be somewhat insurmountable. But it doesn't mean that I'm not going to continue to try. It seems like the White House is at least on some level behind disclosure. We'll see where it goes throughout the next three years. Why is there so much resistance to your request congressman? A lot of it is turf. You have all of the different agencies that protect their information and it's guarded like it's some kind of a commodity. You have committees that protect their turf as well. So if you're not on the right committee, then oftentimes you're turned down and sometimes there's multiple committees that have jurisdiction over a topic and they love turning each other down. So the very nature and the difficulty of the red tape system within the bureaucracy of
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}