Republican Judge Roger Benitez Strikes Down Democrat Mandated Lying And Tax-Fund [30:45-32:57]
If you try to make teachers into social workers, you're going to screw it up. If you try to make principles into detectives, they're going to screw it up. That's not their job. Even there, courts have recognized that a state has no interest in protecting children from their parents unless it has some definite and articulable evidence giving rise to a reasonable suspicion that a child has been abused or is an imminent danger of abuse. Three Supreme Court justices recently described this issue as a particularly serious contention by the way, they're all Republican justices. Quote, whether a school district violates parents' fundamental rights when, without knowledge, parental knowledge or consent, it encourages a student to transition to a new gender or assist that process, unquote. That's Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch. Those are all Republicans. These justices described the question as one of, quote, great and growing national importance, unquote, run page six at the top. The state bases its legal position on a derogatory derogation of the parents' federal constitutional right to care for and raise their children and an unwarranted and grandizing of a student state created right to privacy. California's education policy makers may be experts on primary and secondary education, but they would not receive top grades as students of constitutional law. Man, I'm going to read that again. This goes on a coffee mug. This goes on a t-shirt. This goes on a calendar. This is December right here. California education policy makers may be experts on primary and secondary education,
← Back to Clarence Thomas's profile