Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 3723 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 3723 To ensure all federally recognized Tribes that are eligible for gaming in the United States are regulated under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES June 4, 2025 Mr. Luttrell (for himself, Ms. Escobar, and Mr. Babin) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To ensure all federally recognized Tribes that are eligible for gaming in the United States are regulated under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act''. SEC. 2. FINDINGS. Congress finds the following: (1) In 1987, the Supreme Court ruled in California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians that if California regulated, rather than prohibited, gaming in the State, then an Indian Tribe could offer similar forms of gaming on its land. (2) In response to the Cabazon decision, the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (Public Law 100-497) was enacted, which has since supported and promoted Tribal economic development and self-sufficiency and continues to provide a regulatory structure for gaming on Tribal lands. (3) Over 200 Indian Tribes in 28 States are currently regulated under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. (4) On June 15, 2022, the Supreme Court ruled that the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama-Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act (Public Law 100-89; 101 Stat. 666) allows the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe to offer, on Tribal lands, gaming activities that are n